Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017, 13:05:38 CEST schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn: > > Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names (which > is the correct syntax per [1]) into fully qualified package atoms (which > is the legacy syntax). Bug 616260 is one such example.
That's one thing. And it's super annoying since the bugzilla e-mails try to provide a diff, but the result is for longer package lists unreadable and not helpful. Also, in some cases, additionally keywords were added and removed from the list without any further comment. Taking this possibility into account, one would have to check any BZ mail with a lot of attention. The much better alternative would be * Don't do any cosmetic changes. They are pointless for a bot-evaluated field. * If you need additional keywords or want to drop something, leave one sentence on the bug with request and reason, and let maintainers sort out the package list field... -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
