On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 13:49 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > Against. Do not touch things you are not working on, council has > already > dropped m68k s390 and sh to exp few years ago. Now we have a big mess > there and only, while ia64 sparc and co have slow but progress and > mature enough stable profiles.
Again, I have had KEYWORDREQs open for more than a year with 0 activity. The only way to get any activity on these arches is to trigger the easteregg of going straight-to-stable, which ago's scripts catch (unlike KEYWORDREQs). This is ofc the total antithesis of using ~arch as a staging ground for stable keywords, but apparently that seems to be desired. I am absolutely willing to postpone the vote on this to after the arches.desc GLEP is finished, but being in denial over dead archs is helping no-one. If all of this ends in one big bikeshedding fest again, I will start dekeywording packages. Fortunately for me, I won't get any complaints (because the arch teams are dead). If the walls are mouldy, do you just paint over them and pretend everything is fine?
