On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 21:04:07 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:28:23 +0100 > Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:44:23 -0400 > > Yury German <bluekni...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Thank you! That's very helpful. A few clarifying questions below > > to be absolutely clear. > > > > > OK so let me repeat the comments that were made on @dev (and expand a > > > bit further) and close the issue. > > > > > > 1. Maintainers are free to cc the non-stable and experimental arches as > > > part of their call for stabilization. It is up to the maintainer of the > > > package to decide. > > > > > > 2. This is providing that there is no problems caused by stableboy or > > > extra dependencies raised > > > Note: as a follow up change was made: 07:47 <@kensington> leio: b-man: > > > good point, dropped sparc from stable_arches > > > > > > 3. Clean up is required as part of the security bug process, and if an > > > arch is holding it up (example hppa before Slyfox took it over) an issue > > > would have to be raised with the QA team for action. [1] > > > > 'Cleanup' is only vulnerabe ebuild removal, not CC removal from the bug, > > right? > > > > > 4. Bugs will be closed without waiting for any non-security supported > > > arches, once the security process is complete. > > > > CC for exp lagging arches are not removed from the bug, right? > > > > > 5. Security bugs are not re-assigned since they are assigned as a > > > vulnerability in bugzilla. If you need to continue work on the bug, > > > please feel free to open another bug for the particular arch for > > > stabilization, fix, etc. > > > > > > If you have any questions please let me know. > > > > > > > > > [1] - > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Security/GLSA_Coordinator_Guide#Bugs_in_.5Bcleanup.5D_status > > > > > Ping. Ping^2 -- Sergei
pgpdubsZsuMuN.pgp
Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
