Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2017, 13:21:47 CET schrieb Fabian Groffen: > Can we make it a policy to list /what/ QA issues are the justification > for commits like these? A description in the commit message would be > preferred, but a pointer to a location where said issues can be found > would do too. > > Thanks, > Fabian > > On 14-12-2017 12:10:59 +0000, Andreas Hüttel wrote: > > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=34e2c43f
That would have been a good thing to do, yes. Unfortunately I was between two meetings, just saw the message on #gentoo-qa that someone had committed straight to m-n, and if it could be reverted by someone with tree access, and decided to quickly help out. (And adding a new package straight to m-n is in my opinion enough reason for an immediate revert.) That said I think we have sorted out things in the meantime. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
