On 14-12-2017 14:34:51 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 20∶24 +0700, użytkownik > gro...@gentoo.org napisał: > > If the developers of liblinebreak had not decided to rename their library, > > I could safely bump it from 2.1 to 4.0, in spite of the fact that it is > > maintainer-needed, right? > > Am I personally responsible for their decision to use the new name > > libunibreak? > > No, it wouldn't be fine. We might not even have noticed it if you > at least bothered to update the Manifest. Please stop looking for > excuses and loopholes, and start doing something good for Gentoo.
So, breaking the tree, just because someone forgot to set the maintainer field is doing something good for Gentoo? (That's called QA?) https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-commits/message/7f34111f0e45f451d5b3a5a58b057d51 Thanks, Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
