On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has >>> accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: >>> >>> Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger >>> than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they should >>> be put into SRC_URI e.g. via tarballs. >>> >>> (the total size being computed as a sum of apparent file sizes) >>> >>> The relevant policy vote is finishing at bug #633758 [1]. The CI reports >>> [2] were updated to report packages whose 'files' directories exceed >>> 64 KiB, to avoid adding many new warnings at once. The limit will >>> be lowered down to 32 KiB as packages are fixed to comply with the new >>> policy. >>> >>> At the same time, I would like to explicitly remind developers that >>> the spirit of the policy is 'do not let "files" grow large', not 'make >>> sure you're one byte less than 32769.' Do not argue that your package >>> exceeds the limit only by few bytes -- even if it gets close to the >>> limit, then it means it's way too large. >> >> I just want to voice my opinion on this: as a developer, this policy >> is a royal pain in the ass. >> >> I would ask the council to please increase this limit to at least 100 >> KiB, preferably more. >> > As a user I would like to ask everyone involved to stick to the 32kB > limit so that we (as in everyone) don't have to fetch megabytes of > patches we'll never use, just because someone was lazy. >
How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with everything being pushed to websites like GitHub by default.
