On 18-02-04 19:20:33, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Matt Turner schrieb am 04.02.18 um 19:04 Uhr: > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > > > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org > > > > Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distributing binaries to > > users. > > +1 .. and I just wanted to add that this might be something very > valuable if you want some sort of public binhost like it is the case in > another current thread on this list. > > I would think of a giantic cache. If someone else already has built a > reproducable bin-package of an ebuild with the exact same > profile/USE/binutils/gcc/... combination that I am using too, then this > would be something very useful IMO which saves a lot of buildtime and > energy. >
Yes, I think a lot of the same stuff could go into our build system. Simple stuff like using the same date for things for instance. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
