Mike Auty schrieb:
Installation will proceed, but the user will get a big fat warning that
the sys-fs/zfs package is potentially broken.

This seems like a sure-fire way to make users paranoid and/or
desensitized?  People will learn to ignore warnings if we make them big
red and flashing but then say they're only potential breakages (and they
subsequently discover that most everything runs fine).  If they learn to
ignore big red flashing warnings it'll be more difficult when they're
not potential breakages but actual ones we've accurately identified...

Maybe "big fat warning" was a bit of an overstatement. I meant the same kind of notice that @preserved-rebuild set produces today. Or the "configuration files need updating" message.

Much like the aforementioned, the affected package might continue to work totally fine, or be broken in subtle ways. It might bother the user enough to report a bug, but hopefully not enough to turn them away from Gentoo.

Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Reply via email to