On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 3:19 AM Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 12:01:21 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 11:54 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 May 2019 11:41:41 +0200 > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > There's multilib that adds a lot of flags with a single eclass > > > > > change, but I'd guess the number of packages and flags is > > > > > constantly growing, so sooner or later you'll be hit by this > > > > > again and no multilib killing will help you then. > > > > > > > > > > I think it is more future proof to use the addition of multilib > > > > > flags to fix pkgcheck rather than actively reducing the number > > > > > of multilib flags to cope with its limitations. > > > > > > > > Then please do it, by all means. The reality is simple. If the > > > > tool is broken, you either fix it or stop doing what you know > > > > that breaks it. Being unable to do the former, and having no good > > > > replacement, I'd go for the latter. > > > > > > Well, why is it slow ? IO ? CPU ? Did you collect profiling data ? > > > > CPU definitely. More detail than that, I don't and I don't have time > > to investigate. > > So you don't have time to change 3 lines to add cProfile but do have > time to send various emails and rework the entire multilib system ? > weird.
This isn't productive. If you'd like to do the work you're suggesting, I'm sure Michał will support that, but as is you're just passive-aggressively questioning his choices in the regards to the multilib system he created and the CI system he created.