On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason >>> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install >>> applications for the end user. > >> The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that >> do not install end-user applications but Python modules. > > Like www-apps/nikola, for example? >
Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated. It works fine and has many users. Did you look into that package before hard masking? I see no problems with this package. https://github.com/getnikola/nikola/blob/master/setup.py Please undo the masking of fully working packages. -- Best, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
