On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 22:53 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
> El 13/7/20 a las 22:07, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) escribió:
> > El 13/7/20 a las 21:27, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:33 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> > > (klondike) wrote:
> > > > El 13/7/20 a las 19:23, Michał Górny escribió:
> > > > > On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 19:07 +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
> > > > > (klondike) wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > We have currently two packages that have USE cpu-flags-x86-rdrand 
> > > > > > as there is no USE_EXPAND version available. This pattern is likely 
> > > > > > to confuse users as they may not be aware of the difference between 
> > > > > > dashes and underscores.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Affected packages:
> > > > > > dev-haskell/cryptonite
> > > > > > dev-libs/json-c
> > > > > > 
> > > > > I'm sorry but I haven't been following the big rdrand-AMD drama 
> > > > > closely.
> > > > >  Does the kernel mitigate broken RDRAND after resume these days?
> > > > > 
> > > > AGESA patches do exist to address this issue: 
> > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/cmza34/agesa_1003_abb_fixes_rdrandrdseed/
> > > >  I suspect AMD microcode does too.
> > > > 
> > > Lemme rephrase: is this something we should be warning our users before
> > > they enable the flag?  I think we should aim to avoid the situation that
> > > cpuid2cpuflags enables this behind user's backs and their programs
> > > suddenly break as a result.
> > You then mean the other rdrand bug.
> > 
> > Yes, current stable linux kernel (5.4.48) in amd64 does include the patch, 
> > I'm uncertain about prior kernel branches though but I don't expect many 
> > users on that confluence.
> > 
> > The patch: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/776cb5c2d33e7fd0d2893904724c0e52b394f24a.1565817448.git.thomas.lenda...@amd.com/
> > The bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85911
> > 
> > 
> I have checked also stable versions for other kernel branches and all seem to 
> have the patch icluded.
> 
> 

LGTM then.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to