On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some > > of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think > > solving these bugs in GURU has lower priority than in Gentoo. > > I think that trackers like CFLAGS/LDFLAGS are here to track how many packages > have the problem. I don't see it like (for example) the gcc-porting tracker > that gives the idea about how much packages need a fix and how much packages > need to be last-rited
If want to track, can't we just have separate tracker(s) for GURU? Now when look at this tracker can't tell how much is ::gentoo or ::guru without doing some extra work. And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together. -- ionen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
