On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +0000, Sam James wrote: > ulm points out that estack.eclass is particularly inefficient > (although > it'll get slightly better once > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31437 > is fixed). > > Let's just manually roll it like llvm.eclass does.
It looks like that was the only use for inhering estack? If so that inherit can go too, right? Hans
