Hans de Graaff <gra...@gentoo.org> writes: > On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +0000, Sam James wrote: >> ulm points out that estack.eclass is particularly inefficient >> (although >> it'll get slightly better once >> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31437 >> is fixed). >> >> Let's just manually roll it like llvm.eclass does. > > It looks like that was the only use for inhering estack? If so that > inherit can go too, right?
Good spot - thanks! > > Hans best, sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
