Arthur Zamarin posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:15:25 +0300 as excerpted: > On 16/06/2024 18.51, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing >> readme.gentoo-r1.eclass. > > So, some weird question from me - why is it called greadme? I can > understand why you don't want to modify existing eclass, but why not > call it "readme.gentoo-r2.eclass"? This should make it a little less > confusing (cause I imagine folks asking - which to use. With -r2 we all > know which one is better).
I had the same question but it was answered to my satisfaction in [PATCH v3 0/1]. Quoting from that: >>> [I]f anyone wants to have function names like >>> 'readme.gentoo-r2_pkg_postinst', then we can go with that. Convinced me! greadme's /just/ fine, thankyou! =:^) (Tho purely bikeshedding I'd prefer g2readme or gen2readme. Which FWIW would match my gentoo bug shortcut g2b/g2bug...) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
