On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:57 pm, Monte Negro wrote: > I searched the list, read all the documents mentioned in the previous > posts, and still can not figure what I am doing wrong. I am affraid that > this is very n00bish question.
it's a bug in gcc ... i uploaded 2005.0 stages to resolve this to work around it, export GCC_SPECS to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-pc-linux-uclibc/3.4.1/specs and re-emerge gcc -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
