On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:52:44PM +0100, Grobian wrote: > On 27-01-2006 09:12:43 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: > > > Nope, it's related to the later portage tools dropping 'hardcoded > > > support' for OSX, that's why I haven't keyworded the newer version, > > > because it simply generates python stack traces for some tools (not > > > emerge), which I don't consider to be "good". It was deliberately not > > > fixed (sort of impossible), hence deliberately not keyworded by me. > > > > What tools? > > Granted, buttload of portage bugs (thus easy to miss something), but > > portage bundled tools should be forcing sys.path mangling. > > Bug #113551 > > Problem is IMHO that on our current setup our shells don't get the stuff > from portage, because the shells don't come with the gentoo rc scripts.
Err... legacy crap (yay). Comment regarding "won't be a problem for long"- would be nice having some clarification on that one :) The tools that are broken *still* should be external to portage (exception is emaint). Any others, should have the hardcoded insertion. ~harring
pgpoMNXHcppih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
