On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 08:50:58PM +0100, Grobian wrote: > On 27-01-2006 11:16:05 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: > > > Bug #113551 > > > > > > Problem is IMHO that on our current setup our shells don't get the stuff > > > from portage, because the shells don't come with the gentoo rc scripts. > > > > Err... legacy crap (yay). > > Comment regarding "won't be a problem for long"- would be nice having > > some clarification on that one :) > > Problem does not occur to me in prefixed portage. "long" is a relative > thing. :p > > > The tools that are broken *still* should be external to portage > > (exception is emaint). Any others, should have the hardcoded > > insertion. > > Ehm, ok. When will your 'fix' be available for us? In next snapshot > release of portage 2.1? Thanks by the way. At least for emaint, commited the path insertion earlier today. You're going to need to be a bit more specific if there are others failing though.
~harring
pgpO6L1wdrL5D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
