On 3/16/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16-03-2006 12:14:18 -0800, m h wrote: > > On 3/16/06, m h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'll try copying over the normal tree from my gentoo box. > > > > > I fixed it by doing an absolute symlink rather than relative > > ie: > > I remember having the same issue. > > > $ ln -s /tmp/Mar16/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1 > > etc/make.profile > > instead of > > $ ln -s usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1 etc/make.profile > > > > Now I need to find out why libc is unavailable... > > > > Portage 2.1.10 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.3, unavailable, > > 2.6.9-5.EL i686) > > I thought I emerged it... but before that... I have no idea if I had it > or not. Makes sense a bit that portage doesn't know it has it. Not > sure whether this is vital or not. > > Hmmm, so should I just try and proceed with emerge system? I get :
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-libs/openssl" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8a (masked by: missing keyword) # Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jul 2005) # Masked for testing, as it breaks api For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. (dependency required by "dev-lang/python-2.4.2" [ebuild]) !!! Problem resolving dependencies for dev-lang/python !!! Depgraph creation failed. I can go through and deal with these, but I don't want to get started down a track if it's the wrong one. Did you run into lots of issues in the portage tree? I'm assumming I should use the one I pointed to earlier. I'd prefer not to mix/match from the normal tree. But I'm open to suggestions on the best way to proceed. -- [email protected] mailing list
