On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:38 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tuesday 08 February 2005 11:44, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:30:20 +0100
> >
> > Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Have a variable per useflag. Not easy
> >
> > Yep, it needs to be a single variable to fit in the cache and be
> > accessible by simple aux_get calls.
> >
> > > - Have different markers. Something like marking the useflag
> > > with colons
> > >   e.g.: ":debug: Enable debugging support :X: Make the client
> > >   aware of the X mouse"
> >
> > I would add parenthesis, something like that:
> 
> I think square or angle brackets might be better. We must use markers
> that  are not normally used in description texts. While supporting
> nesting is  possible it makes things harder than they need to be.
> >
> > USE_DESC=" \
> >     foo:(Add foolib support. Warning: that replaces libbar.) \
> >     X:(Add an experimental X client, still a bit instable.)"

So now you see why I don't want it in the ebuilds. Also it has the
potential to add a lot of redundancy, especially if you keep in mind
that the original idea was to give more detailed explanation of USE
flags. IMO it should be handled the same way as the long package
descriptions.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachment: pgp7ikyUqZXvc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to