On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:41:30 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2005 16:33, Fabian Zeindl wrote: > > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > I would be happy to add it to metadata.xml. I think it would be > > > easier to do so, and the tools might come with the possibility. > > > Direct portage support is not needed. > > > > I just thought that ebuild relevant information is in the ebuild and > > gentoo-developer-organisation information is in metadata.xml, but if > > it's easier this way, that's OK for me ;-). > > Should I make a GLEP about that? > > Actually one item in metadata.xml is longdescription which allows for > a full-text description of the package. This element is not widely > used, but a valid element. If non-one complains within a day, I'll > add support to the document type definition. Make sure you announce it very visible so foser knows who to complain to ;) Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgpjk8qtPATwe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
