On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:41:37AM -0500, Nicholas Jones wrote: > > the person that implements it (xml wouldn't be an issue). > > XML is an issue presently. XML requires C++, and we don't have > that on the stage1 tarballs. Reviewing that restriction is on > my todo list. Unless I'm on crack, xml.sax should be purely python based (batteries included approach)... So, the stage tarballs nuking xml is an issue, but it's not a dep issue afaik. ~harring
-- [email protected] mailing list
