On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:42:55 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | What's stated above, and what this thread has come down to is that | you're putting a lot of reqs and pointing at whatever roadblock you | can for anyone who attempts it. Kudos, although bluntly, talk is | cheap.
Bah. Not roadblocks, basic design requirements. | Produce a patch and maybe people will listen to you, otherwise those | of us who are tired of listening to others state how it should be | done (but do nothing but talk), are going to jump in and do it, | addressing the issues thus pointed out. Unlike some, I don't pretend to know enough about the design part of this to even consider working on a patch. Code that does the wrong thing is at best worthless. | In other words, their really is no point in debating people | attempting it. They're going too, and as I made pretty bluntly clear, | the only say you've got on this is as a member of the dev community | when/if they push for it to go mainline. ...at which point, you will claim "the work is already done, so it's too late to block this now". | If people are up for the continuing pissing match, take it private. "I'm not hearing what I want to hear, so I will repeatedly throw out lots of ad hominem attacks and wild accusations rather than address the issues at hand." -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpdvxGwcbXrq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
