On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Okay, new suggestion. > > > > Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods > > necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. > > That would be 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get > > trunk out masked at around the same time. As soon as 2.0.54 goes stable > > put trunk into ~arch. However, instead of ~arch meaning "regression fixes > > only" we could just limit it to "minor changes only" (ie. no big > > refactorings, rewrites or similar high risk changes) until it is time to > > stable it. > > I think it would be wise to reconsider the cache fixes. I know you have > been away from irc for a while now and have missed the daily events, > but most of the people we have interacted with are expecting the cache > updates in .54 (alot of people complaining about the hanging at 50%)
Call me wrong, but I'm feeling that the constant pulling and pushing on IRC causes many misjudgements. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
