On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:42:49 +0100 George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, found it. > Thanks Marius! (for the debug hint) > > It was indeed forcing gnat-gcc-4.1.1 by asis-gcc-4.1.1 which has > =dev-lang/gnat-4.1.1 (this is an "extension" to compiler and has to > match it 1 for 1, forgot to bump that one :(). > However, shouldn't --tree have reported the relevant package as > requiring this downgrade instead of some other, pretty much arbitrary > (from dependants of gnat-gcc)? In an ideal world: yes, but portage is far from being ideal (I won't pretend to know the internals of the dep resolver, so can't give a good explanation for this behavior). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
