On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:05:35 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add two warnings to the QA GCC warning message reporter > for GCC 4.2. I think it would be useful if the set of warnings could be customisable outside of portage (in particular, to render it independent of portage revisions). I'm thinking of a profile file - which could also then be different for different profiles. Also worth noting; if you stick '-Wall' in CFLAGS, in my experience something like 1 in 5-6 packages fail as a result (on a recent world rebuild, 224 out of 1273). It's a much higher rate than any of the other QA checks, and it makes it hard to see the wood for the trees - it also means it's impractical to set FEATURES=stricter. To this end it would also be useful if the QA notices were _all_ sent to the elog report; the "Files were installed with user/group portage" one is, but I don't think any of the others are. My time is rather limited to do anything about it for a month or two, but I thought I'd throw this into the melting pot for thought at least. -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
