Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > On Monday 19 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote: >> Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA >> checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this >> function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it >> exists and fall back to echo. > > it isnt part of the PMS ... so it'd need to be added > -mike
I don't see it being important enough to warrant a place in EAPI=0. EAPI=1 for sure. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
