On Monday 14 May 2012 18:42:07 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 05/14/2012 01:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 14 May 2012 15:08:32 Zac Medico wrote:
> >> Actually, the inode_var_name thing will not work unless it's all in
> >> one process.
> > 
> > hmm, true, but that's the level we currently parallelize at, so it's
> > fine.  we do one subprocess per ELF and that includes the
> > strip/splitdebug/splitsources.
> > 
> > parallelizing more than on a per-ELF basis will require much finer
> > grained queues which, while possible, would make the file much harder to
> > hack on and extend.  and i'm not sure we'd see that much of a gain.
> 
> The thing is, in the case of hardlinks, we're parallelizing multiple
> times on the *same* elf. Anyway, I've fixed it by using a directory full
> of hardlinks, in these commits:

well, realistically speaking, hardlinking has been broken before the 
parallelization work.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/400767

> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=ad9442
> 75b88a50d2a1f694826b127cceb9221e78
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=9ed00
> a9e70a3705164a5349145ff467e5c40ddfd

i'll go through it and see what's what
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to