On Tuesday 14 January 2014 16:15:48 Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:59:11 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > we probably should just use dev branches in the main repo, at least > > for people who have write access to the repo > > > > dev/$USERNAME/<whatever you want> > > To be more clear, which one? g.o.g.o, GitHub or is one of both fine?
g.o.g.o > > > r'\s*src_(configure|prepare)\s*\(\)' > > > > > > You can then proceed further and move the re outside: > > the idea was to walk a balance between simplicity and > > maintainability. imo, the fixed version above is the best. > > What about the latter improvements about the parentheses? seems fine > > as long as portage supports an EAPI, i see no reason to omit useful > > checks like this. > > Repeating my original question in different words: Why is it useful? people run repoman outside of the main tree. we don't really know their desire for EAPI compatibility. legacy/old portage/who knows. Chromium OS for a long time was restricted to EAPI 4 for two reasons -- it had an old portage version (and upgrading to a newer one regressed performance significantly, so we held off until we could figure out why), and it was using a really old stage3 to build the SDK (which means we needed to support upgrading an old system too). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
