On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:22:31PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:18:39 -0800 W. Trevor King wrote: > > I'm all for recording suggested conventions in DEVELOPING, but I > > don't think it's worth the trouble to over-specify the conditions > > under which each tag should be used, or to lay out consequences > > for cases where they're forgotten. The faith part is trusting > > devs to understand and apply the written suggestions, not in > > determining what the suggestions are. > > Which brings me back to my very first words of this sub thread: > > Either someone cares about the background of a patch or he/she > doesn't.
That's certainly true. My initial impression was that you were against suggesting these conventions in DEVELOPING. Perhaps I missunderstood. Cheers, Trevor -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
