On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it? > > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is > perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough, > but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that > isn't already present in the output of patch itself. >
It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text while others don't. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
