On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:15 PM Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >> > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that > >> > is perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be > >> > enough, but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide > >> > any info that isn't already present in the output of patch itself. > >> > >> It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text > >> while others don't. > > > It also triggers pointless bug reports. Please remove this. > > I don't like that eqawarn either (see above). > > OTOH, users shouldn't normally have "qa" in PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES, > so they won't see the warning?
Here's a bug report filed by a user, which is what prompted me to reply on this thread in the first place. https://bugs.gentoo.org/702608
