----- Forwarded message from Lance Lassetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:10:12 -0600 From: Lance Lassetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-server] Gentoo security announcement web tool this seems really simple enough, or am i overlooking something. /me is very newbie. regards, lance(stuNNed) On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 02:17:00AM +1030, stephen white wrote: > On 11/02/2005, at 4:09 AM, Wendall Cada wrote: > >Possibly for packages that one intentionally wants to push outside of > >the stable tree. Something similar to package.keywords, only not moving > >to unmasked or ARCH, but rather just to current package marked stable > >in > >the main tree. > > After thinking about this for some time, I think the biggest problem is > coming from: > > KEYWORDS="~x86" > > since it is combining version control with architecture specification. > If it were possible to have something like: > > KEYWORDS="+x86" > > where the "+" was defined as the baseline that the user has marked > stable (eg, a script run against the current portage), then that would > achieve most of the objectives nicely. > > So my thoughts are generally drifting around this area, and a quick > hack to test the theory. :) > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CRICOS Provider Number 00123M > ------------------------------------------------ > This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) > and contains information that may be confidential and/or > copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please > notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete > this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email > by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly > prohibited. No representation is made that this email or > any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is > recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient. ----- End forwarded message -----
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
