Interbase was started in 1984, first released in 1985 I believe.. PostgreSQL
started in 1986 (not sure when it was 'released').  

I think Interbase has been in the mainstream longer however.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: raptor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 5:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Databases - which one
> 
> 
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:05:11 -0400
> "brett holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> |I'm looking for a database for use on my home systems -
> |doesn't have to handle large transactions.  I was planning 
> |on using PostGRESQL but noticed Firebird and was doing 
> |some reading on it.  Any pros or cons, experiences of one 
> |vs the other?
> |
> |Thanks.
> 
> ]- I will bet on Firebird. :") I have used PostgeSQL in the 
> past and was not so impressed... at that time it lacked alot 
> of features (notably outer joins), now I think it is OK. 
> Some good feature of PG object-oriented TABLE 
> specs(inheritance) and such.. Interbase have been around for 
> much longer time.
> 
> 
>  As I wrote earlier :
> ]- firebird(interbase) - multiversioning engine(i.e not lock 
> based), small-footprint, install&forget, fork&threaded variants, 
> subselects/joins/triggers/etc all is there... very simple way 
> to add new functions via Delphi/Kylix or C (UDF)
> - SUSPEND in stored-procs i.e. stored-proc may behave like 
> normal TABLE ( i.e. SELECT * FROM storedproc() )
> - before/after triggers
> - The creator of interbase still work on FireBird.
> - afaik interbase is used in M1 tank :")
> - from all DB I know, it is avail. on more platforms that others 
> - long history, do u remember Borland was No1 in DB
> - there is records of working DB as large as 200-400GB 
> http://firebirdsql.org/ 
> http://firebirdsql.org/index.php?> op=history&id=beginning
> 
> 
> --
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to