Spider wrote: > begin quote > On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:04:01 +0100 (WEST) > Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > a) The headers that were present when glibc was compiled >> > > (regardless of what kernel was used to compile it and what kernel >> > > one is using now)?
>> So, "a)" is the answer to my question. Right? > Yes, that is correct. This does not really enlighten me. What does 'were present' mean? I assume you mean 'were used'. But then I still don't know which one these are. A self-contained kernel-header ebuild, possibly of a fixed version dependend on the glibc ebuild version? Or is it a collection of headers inside the glibc ebuild itself? Or are these the headers that /usr/src/linux links to? In the first case, we should better rebuild the glibc after the recent kernel header update, isn't it? Except it was a very minor update. mg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
