On 12/02/03 Allen Parker wrote: > You should definitely file your own bug report. One of the caveats of > running "~x86" is that sometimes things are just broken. I'd suggest a > rebuild with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" instead as portage-2.0.49-r15 is > working fine for me. If there are things that are masked > unstable/experimental that you need, you can always emerge search > <package> cd/usr/portage/<package-base>/<package> and then emerge > <package>-<version>-<revision>.ebuild
This bug has nothing todo with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. > Carpaski, I cc'd you because you are of course the minor deity of all > that is portage! I invoke thee, in the name of Gentoo, please bestow > help upon this poor user and fix his portage! He can fix it himself, check bug 31901 on http://bugs.gentoo.org Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
