Tom Wesley wrote: > I think that there is a high degree of probability that > portage-ng(-ng(-ng)) ;) will include some form of tree selection. I > personally would like to see something like this. Either pointing to > a completely different rsync server set, or having a extended set of > architecture definitions. I prefer the latter, as in x86-server, > ~x86-server, x86-desktop, x86-testing and the like. Security updates > would of course need to penetrate all types here. Maybe ~x86 and x86 > simply isn't enough of a split between what is stable and what isn't > anymore, especially because enterprise server people are looking at > Gentoo. > > Just my 2p...
I would like to see portage based upon a CVS repository in much the way FreeBSD port collection is. It would be nice to be able to go back to a snapshot from 1 year ago if need be. How this would be implmeneted with portage in front of it, I am uncertain, but that would be a nice goal IMHO. Tom Veldhouse -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
