On Monday 09 Feb 2004 13:35, Grendel wrote: > On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Peter Ruskin commented thusly, > > > On Monday 09 Feb 2004 10:32, Grendel wrote: > > > No, it means that if you use a frame buffer, then you will have > > > to use linux's agp driver instead of nvidias agp driver. reall > > > there isnt much difference but the nvidia agp driver seems > > > stabler than linux's agp driver. But there is very little > > > difference practically I think. > > > > I'm sorry but that is absolute rubbish. > > Could you please show me why this is the case? Just give me some > facts or benchmarks please rather than making one liners like the > above, which do not reflect well on your disposition. > > All what i know is that > 1. If you have agpgart and nvidia_agp loaded then you CANNOT run > nvidias AGP driver. > Your first sentence was incorrect. Whether or not you use VESA framebuffer, you _can_ use AGPGART or the Nvidia AGP driver. -- ====================================================================== Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.50. kernel-2.6.2. gcc(GCC): 3.3.2. i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. KDE: 3.1.5. Qt: 3.2.3. ======================================================================
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
