Check /usr/src/linux/arch/boot for bzImage. If /boot wasn't mounted when you generated it you will have to mount /boot and copy bzImage to /boot/whateveryouwanttocallit.
> > From: "Rob Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2004/02/12 Thu PM 05:34:08 GMT > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New Install > > I can not find the bzImage after I do a manual make. I mount > /boot myself... How do I turn the kernel into a bzImage? > > Thanks, > Rob > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernie Schroder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:14 AM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New Install > > > On Thursday 12 February 2004 11:57 am, Jose González Gómez wrote: > > Rob, > > > > Manual compilation or using genkernel? What about error > > messages? Have you double checked everything is fine in /boot? > > > > Regards > > Jose > > > > Rob Barnett escribió: > > > I have a dell Inspiron 8500 notebook. > > > > > > I have installed using gentoo-dev-sources using stage-1. > > > Everything worked great > > > I booted into it and discovered that I did not configure my > > > network card or a file > > > system that was required by 2.6. I tryed to do another make as > > > before but > > > when I try to boot into it, it would not. Is there something I > > > missed with the kernel > > > to compress it or something so that grub will boot using it. I > > > can only boot using > > > the original kernel that I created. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rob > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > The first place to look is: Did you mount /boot and copy over the new > bzImage? A normal Gentoo system runs with /boot unmounted. I've also > heard noise that the latest genkernel doesn't mount /boot either. > IMHO, genkernel is not ready for prime time, or if it is, the > documentation is sadly lacking > -- > Regards, Ernie > 100% Microsoft and Intel free > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
