If you want InnoDB, how about adding "innodb" to your USE-variable in make.conf and forget all about not having it?
This _is_ the point of that variable, is it not, or am i missing something crucial?
Seeing that the USE-variable is among the first things you set up on a new system, i don't see what the problem is really. If you want it, you add it, and it's there forever and ever. As for not being default, no Gentoo-system is default or standard and that's the whole point of it, and i for one like my default ebuilds to be minimal so i can add only the stuff i want.


  /Bjorn, compiling without InnoDB until the need arises

John Dangler wrote:

ABSOLUTELY!!! - If nothing else, add it as a separate entry in Portage
(mysql_w_innodb)... I for one, use innodb...


John Dangler

-----Original Message-----
From: Arjen Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 7:50 AM
To: community
Subject: little crusade for Gentoo to compile with InnoDB


Hi all,

Many users run into the problem that on Gentoo, InnoDB is disabled. It's
not even compiled in. So, no transactions, no foreign keys. Unless you
recompile.

Someone reported it as a Gentoo bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
It was closed as "Won't Fix" and the argument was
"USE=innodb greatly increases the MySQL compile time.
So for those that don't want it, I see no reason to include it."

I added a kind note asking for this to be changed/fixed.
If you're a Gentoo user, please add your vote to this.
And please encourage other Gentoo users to do likewise.
Thanks!

Regards,
Arjen.



-- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Reply via email to