Grant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled: > > > I'd like to keep an eye on what's going on in my warehouse. I've got > > > a solid 802.11g network going with WPA now. What do you guys suggest? [snip] > > You may want to keep this in mind: > > Cowpatty: http://www.remote-exploit.org/?page=codes > > wpa_cracker: http://www.tinypeap.com/ > > > > Personally, if I'm setting up security infra, I would go wired. It's a > > PIA to set up, but worth it in the long run. > > WPA cracker? That's news to me. Is it as vulnerable as WEP now?
They are both WPA crackers, and from the looks of it so far, it is purely dictionary-attack. Unfortunately, I haven't had much time to play with it yet. I just hold onto these links till I get time... :) So, no, WPA is not _as_ vulnerable as WEP yet. But I wouldn't rely on either of them. If your physical environment demands wireless, use one of them (WPA|WEP), and tunnel all your data though ssh/vpn/tor. just my $0.02 Cooper. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
