Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-09 12:28 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:21:17 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
I'm guessing it won't hurt anything, again as long as I don't
stupidly switch to it?
Right.
And if a script specifically wants Python 3, it is there for it to
use.
Cool, thanks guys...
I agree with the other replies. You have it there now so just let it
be. Just don't switch to it until there is a news item that says
everything is ready. I would even make sure everything depends on
python 3 and nothing depends on python 2 before switching, just in case
you have something that will break and cause you grief.
To think the devs didn't believe this was going to cause some confusion.
< sighs >
Dale
:-) :-)
