Apparently, though unproven, at 18:03 on Monday 30 August 2010, Paul Hartman 
did opine thusly:

> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <bil...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Nikos Chantziaras schrieb am 27.08.2010 18:06:
> >> On 08/27/2010 07:02 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >>> Actually, you can:
> >>> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-boot-rootfs/index.htm
> >>> l
> >>> 
> >>> (Read the section below "Use a label"):
> >>> 
> >>> fstab:
> >>> LABEL=ROOT          /         ext3    defaults        1 1
> >>> LABEL=BOOT          /boot     ext3    defaults        1 2
> >>> LABEL=SWAP          swap      swap    defaults        0 0
> >>> LABEL=HOME          /home     ext3    nosuid,auto     1 2
> >> 
> >> This syntax never worked here.  Always resulted in an unbootable system.
> >>  Only the /dev/disk/by-label/ syntax works reliably.
> > 
> > Afaik if you are using GRUB LEGACY (0.97) and want to use LABEL/UUID in
> > your grub.conf/menu.lst you also need an initrd. I think with GRUB 2
> > (1.98) it is possible without. You don't need an initrd for LABEL/UUID
> > in /etc/fstab for both cases.
> 
> FWIW I'm using sys-boot/grub-0.97-r10 with GPT, labeled partitions and
> no initrd. My kernel has EFI_PARTITION compiled in (no module).
> 
> My fstab looks like this:
> 
> LABEL=swap       none            swap            sw              0 0
> LABEL=boot      /boot    ext2    defaults,noatime                1 2
> LABEL=root       /       ext4    defaults,noatime                0 1
> LABEL=home      /home   ext4    defaults,noatime        0 1
> 
> My kernel boot commandline still specified root by device name
> /dev/sda2 but otherwise my system works normally so far. :)

Don't listen to nay-sayers. Your fstab will work just fine and there's nothing 
wrong with it.

The LABEL= sysntax has also worked for years and years now on all grub-
supported filesystems that support volume labels. I don't know where a 
previous poster got the idea from that it is not supported, or you need an 
initrd - I have never used an initrd on Gentoo and have used that syntax since 
forever.

Similar for claims of unreliability by someone else. The only cause I can 
think of is using weird grub patches or some combination of insane flags.


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Reply via email to