On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:22:05 -0500, Dale wrote: > Wouldn't this be like putting package.* back to a file instead of a > directory tho? That would seem like one step forward and two steps > back. Maybe I am missing something again. I sort of got some "issues" > going on around here. :/
No, the discussion is about the name of the file in package.unmask. if that is a file there is no issue. The problem is that portage just picks a file from that directory, it should either have its own file in there or add the entries to a file named after the package. -- Neil Bothwick An unemployed Court Jester is nobody's fool.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
