On Saturday 08 October 2011, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 10/08/11 15:09, Francesco Talamona wrote: > > I'm not going to complain, though I'm willing to point out (e.g. > > commenting on relevant bug reports) that some packages are affected > > in a bad way by this move. > > Comment here? The devs are still CCed even though it's closed: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/250179 > > > To be honest I didn't look for a solution in b.g.o because it was > > straightforward; even if not so manifest for me the link between > > the perl flag and the ability for rxvt to run tabbed (given that > > it doesn't give an error). > > > > I don't want to be blunt, but your plan looks to me quite vague. > > My opinion is that some packages should have a different default. > > That bug is for adding IUSE defaults, rather than removing the flag.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250179#c16 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386827 Cheers Francesco -- Linux Version 3.0.6-gentoo, Compiled #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Oct 8 20:18:59 CEST 2011 Two 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Processors, 4GB RAM, 4019.26 Bogomips Total aemaeth
