On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. <da...@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote: > -- > > > > On March 17, 2012 at 12:19 AM "Canek Peláez Valdés" <can...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken >> > >> > >> > >> > Happy Computer Users (for now), systemd is on your horizon. >> > >> > Houston, we have a problem! >> >> You can always try Walter's et. al. mdev replacement: >> >> http://www.waltdnes.org/mdev/ > > > Sad fact is systemd will soon be required in Gentoo.
I don't think so. Not in the near future at least. Of course, *I* don't think that will be a sad fact, but that's another matter :D > Forget the udev/mdev argument ... Oh, I have never cared that much for it ;) > systemd is poorly coded, Many people think that it tries to solve a problem that "doesn't exists", or that it has failures in its design. However, even the more fervent critics agree that Lennart is a really good programmer. You are the first person I read saying that systemd is "poorly coded". In other words: [citation needed] > and we're > getting so much further from a good, reliable DE to compete with the likes > of Windows 7. Just horse manure DEs in Gentoo now. I would say that we are actually better than them in several ways. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
