Am Sonntag, 18. März 2012, 09:23:00 schrieb Bruce Hill, Jr.: > On March 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM Volker Armin Hemmann > > <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 18. März 2012, 08:01:59 schrieb Bruce Hill, Jr.: > > > On March 18, 2012 at 3:54 AM Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> I recall reading on this list a week or two ago that kernel > > > > >> autoassembly of 0.90 arrays was deprecated. :( > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> > > > > >> :wq > > > > > > > > > > Works on my computers. > > > > > > > > And mine. But 'deprecated' means 'this may go away in the future'. > > > > > > My question ... who says it's deprecated and why? > > > > the kernel devs because the kernel might get it wrong and for some reason > > they > > > think that this is worse then mdadm getting it wrong. Which is of course > > bullshit because either way you are f*cked. > > It works better in kernel than userspace presently, and doesn't require a > nasty initrd image, so I'm sticking with that. > > Might you post from LKML where said "kernel devs" deprecated kernel > assembly of RAID us 0.90 metadata?
no, but I might remember another thread on lkml that discussed autoassemble. Be free to waste lots of time: http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=126592924232390&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=126628146211758&w=2 -- #163933
