On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Michael Scherer <a6702...@unet.univie.ac.at> wrote: > I'm always replying to gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org and I'm not aware I ever > used > one of the addresses you mentioned below. I'm rather new to this forum, so > it's > entirely possible I did something wrong somewhere, so please tell me where > else > I should post my replies. > And if you feel the urge to correct me on my postings you might as well post > some > advice on my problem too. > > > michael > > -- > Michael Scherer > Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie > email: michael.sche...@meduniwien.ac.at > phone: +43 6991 941 22 54 > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stroller" >> <strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> >> To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> >> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2012 23:08 >> >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails >> >> >> >> On 10 May 2012, at 15:20, Michael Scherer wrote: >>> >>> >>> References: <4faa2f0d.8080...@gmail.com> >>> <4faa595a.4040...@libertytrek.org> >>> >>> <cak2h+ec30vq09u22vac72hsqbjb2zn5b25snh6-d3cdxrre...@mail.gmail.com> >>> >>> <caa2qdgw8uuf3h-cbiqn48f+pboj3ahct2whdd1swze-g7z_...@mail.gmail.com> >>> >>> after downloading the 3.2.12-sources everything went fine >>> for a couple of weeks, I compiled them a couple of times, >>> but suddenly, maybe because of some world-updates, errors >>> started to accumulate, … >> >> >> >> Please don't hijack threads like this: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking >> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.gentoo.user/msg/8a540add45e7e9b8? >> >> "It is irritating for people using thread-aware e-mail clients... >> In case you didn't know, it happens when you use "reply" for sending >> a new question instead of composing a "new" message." >> >> Stroller. >> >>
He pulled those addresses from the message headers that went out with your initial question, which it appears you sent, aiming to start a new thread of discussion on, by hitting reply in the midst of "[gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?" and changing the subject. It's a quick way to get a message headed towards the list, but it *does* throw clients that are better at thread tracking for a bit of a loop (and makes it easy for your question to get lost in an already 40+ message long thread). As for your initial question, building from your config on a clean (distclean, no ccache, etc) 3.1.12 gentoo patched tree built rather quick and problem free on my box here (using -j5 at that. My first guess was a race issue in a parallel build)... You might find something notably different in your versions of things, so here's what I'm running on there. lanos linux-3.2.12-gentoo # emerge --info Portage 2.1.10.49 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.5.3, glibc-2.14.1-r3, 3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: Linux-3.2.1-gentoo-r2-lanos-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_Quad_CPU_Q6600_@_2.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.0.3 Timestamp of tree: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:30:01 +0000 app-shells/bash: 4.2_p20 dev-lang/python: 2.7.2-r3, 3.1.4-r3, 3.2.2 dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.26 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.3 sys-apps/openrc: 0.9.8.4 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.68 sys-devel/automake: 1.11.1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.21.1-r1 sys-devel/gcc: 4.5.3-r2 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.5-r2 sys-devel/libtool: 2.4-r1 sys-devel/make: 3.82-r1 sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.1 (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.14.1-r3 If you're running something newer somewhere, or vanilla-sources, or somesuch I can poke around a bit and see if I can replicate your troubles here, but I can't guarantee short timeframes... I've around 1k miles of travelling this weekend, half of which will be learning quickly whether the car I just grabbed on ebay was a good idea or not. -- Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy
