walt wrote: > On 07/25/2012 05:21 PM, Dale wrote: > >> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds >> reasonable tho. > >From the chip maker's point of view, everything is about battery life > and small size these days. I wonder how many college kids are using > desktops these days. Desktops are only for us dinosaurs who are glued > to our computer chairs. (What fool would try to text from a desktop > machine while driving to school during rush hour on a busy street?)
For a laptop, this could matter. I'm always thinking desktop tho. >> I'm trying to picture a nm. o-o Hmmmm, maybe this is better. O-O >> Nope, still can't picture a nm. lol > Have you tried sci-calculators/units? Very useful utility. It defines > 1 nm as 1000 times the distance between a campaign promise and a damned > lie. > LOL As Mater says on the movie Cars, 'That's funny right there'. ;-) Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
