Am 12.07.2013 18:36, schrieb Timur Aydin:
> On 7/5/2013 11:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>> I since did some googling and it seems I am right and he just thought I
>> was some know nothing guy he could sell some service too. Anyway, has
>> anything changed to make Linux more prone to viruses than it used to
>> be? I read a percentage somewhere that said like 99% of viruses are
>> windoze only. Is there a indisputable source of information on this?
>
> Linux is inherently more secure than Windows, but it isn't so much
> more secure that only 1% of all viruses can attack it. Virus
> developers don't have a financial incentive to develop Linux viruses
> (not enough Linux users, most Linux users knowledgeable about
> computers, and moral reasons).
>
moral reasons... you just made my day....
